Case 8000462/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000462/2024 Ms A Sumorek v National Campaigns International Limited, T/A — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000462/2024
- Decision date
- 28 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000462/2024 Ms A Sumorek
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, so Employment Judge Whitcombe issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £5,800.00 gross for the period of 5 months and 3 weeks.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s accrued holiday entitlement on termination and ordered payment of £651.47, described as 2.82 weeks’ gross pay. The hearing listed for 12 September 2024 was cancelled. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment was £6,451.47.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,800.00 for the period of 5 months and 3 weeks. | Upheld | — | £5,800 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay accrued holiday entitlement on termination and ordered payment of £651.47, described as 2.82 weeks' gross pay. | Upheld | — | £651 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,451
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.