Case 8000467/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Clarke v Care@Home Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000467/2025
- Decision date
- 2 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Clarke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge M Robison determined that Miss A Clarke had been dismissed in breach of contract in relation to notice, and ordered the respondent, 121 Care@Home Ltd, to pay damages of £3,375, calculated as 6 weeks' gross pay at £562.50 per week.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,656.25, calculated as 6.5 weeks' gross pay at £562.50 per week. The judgment therefore awarded both the notice pay damages and the statutory redundancy payment.
The judgment further recorded that the respondent could deduct income tax and employee National Insurance contributions, if required by law, from the notice pay element before making payment, provided it remitted any deductions to HMRC and supplied written evidence of the deductions and remittance. The resulting balance would satisfy the judgment in respect of that element. The combined monetary outcome of the judgment was £7,031.25.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 22 judgment on the available material; the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £3,375, described as 6 weeks' gross pay at £562.50 per week. | Upheld | — | £3,375 |
| Redundancy | Rule 22 judgment on the available material; the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,656.25, described as 6.5 weeks' gross pay at £562.50 per week. | Upheld | — | £3,656 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,031
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.