Case 8000480/2026 · Employment Tribunal
E Davidson v Ness Drinks Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 8000480/2026
- Decision date
- 24 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E Davidson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge A Kemp issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because Ness Drinks Ltd had not presented a response. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from E Davidson's wages by failing to pay the full November wages due. It awarded £1,389.58 gross, being monthly wages of £2,314.58 less £925 already paid.
The tribunal also found that unpaid holiday entitlement amounted to an unauthorised deduction from wages. It awarded £680 gross for five days at eight hours per day and £17 per hour. The claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, for which the tribunal awarded £1,068.27 in damages, calculated as two weeks' gross pay using monthly wages of £2,314.58.
The respondent had also failed to provide written pay statements. The tribunal awarded £1,360 gross, described as two weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. It had no information suggesting that a higher award under that section would be just and equitable.
The total award was £4,497.85. The judgment permitted deductions for income tax and employee National Insurance contributions where required by law, provided the respondent remitted those sums to HMRC and supplied the claimant with written evidence of the deductions and remittance.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid November wages, calculated as £2,314.58 less £925 already paid. Award stated gross. | Upheld | — | £1,390 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement was expressly found to be an unauthorised deduction from wages. Gross award calculated as five days at eight hours per day and £17 per hour. | Upheld | — | £680 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages awarded at two weeks' gross pay. | Upheld | — | £1,068 |
| Other | Failure to provide written pay statements, with £1,360 awarded as two weeks' gross pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. The parenthetical calculation states 40 hours × £17 without showing the two-week multiplier. | Upheld | — | £1,360 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,498
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Section 38 of the Employment Act 2002: whether a higher award was just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.