Case 8000485/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000485/2024 A Onea v Represented by: Certify Lets Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000485/2024
- Decision date
- 22 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000485/2024 A Onea
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with a claim concerning alleged unlawful deductions from wages. It had ordered the claimant to provide a schedule of loss setting out the sums said to have been unlawfully deducted, with compliance required by 20 September 2024. Despite reminders, the claimant did not comply with that order and did not give any good reason for the failure.
On 7 October 2024 and 14 October 2024 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 14 October 2024 and 17 October 2024, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, relying on rule 37(1)(c) for non-compliance with the Rules of Procedure.
The judgment records no merits determination and no monetary award. It was signed by Employment Judge A Jones on 21 October 2024 and entered in the register on 22 October 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(c) for non-compliance with an order requiring a schedule of loss setting out the sums alleged to have been unlawfully deducted from wages. The claimant did not comply, gave no good reason, and did not provide an acceptable explanation or request a hearing despite being given opportunities to respond. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(c) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.