Case 8000487/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000487/2024 Mr K Jardine v Mr R Bell — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000487/2024
- Decision date
- 8 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell Employment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000487/2024 Mr K Jardine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr K Jardine's claim against Mr R Bell under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment states that no defence was lodged and that the claimant was asked to provide information about the sums sought so that judgment could be issued without a hearing, but he did not respond.
The case was listed for a hearing on 1 August 2024, but the claimant did not attend. The Tribunal telephoned the number provided by the claimant, but it was not recognised. On 1 August 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant until 8 August 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing to address that issue.
The claimant did not reply to that correspondence and did not provide any reason why the claim should continue. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary award was made and the judgment records no separate remedy assessment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not describe the underlying claim type; this classification is based on the gov.uk listing category supplied with the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.