Case 8000510/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mitchell v St. Andrew’s Timber & Building Supplies Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000510/2024
- Decision date
- 28 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mitchell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt this preliminary hearing the tribunal considered whether Ms Mitchell was a disabled person under section 6 Equality Act 2010 during the relevant period, 11 December 2022 to 20 February 2024, for the purposes of the respondents' outstanding deposit application on the reasonable adjustments complaint. The claimant gave evidence and the tribunal heard from Ms Astrid McCabe and Ms Kerrie Ferguson. It found the claimant credible on the nature and impact of her condition, and accepted much of the respondents' evidence about how she appeared at work.
The tribunal found that the claimant suffered from anxiety and that this was an underlying condition rather than merely a reaction to stressful life events. It relied on the GP records, repeated prescriptions, and the GP letter dated 5 August 2024 showing consultations relating to anxiety dating back to December 2020, together with evidence that symptoms returned when medication was stopped. Leaving medication out of account, it found substantial adverse effects on normal day-to-day activities including self-care, shopping and social contact, and that those effects had lasted, or were likely to last, for at least 12 months.
The tribunal therefore held that the claimant was a disabled person within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time. It also recorded that no merits determination of the underlying discrimination complaint was being made at this hearing, and that any further case management before the final hearing could be raised within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal determined that the claimant was a disabled person under section 6 Equality Act 2010 during the relevant period 11 December 2022 to 20 February 2024; it did not decide the underlying reasonable adjustments complaint on the merits. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- substantial means more than minor or trivial
- likely means could well happen
- Equality Act 2010 (Amendment) Regulations 2023, regulation 6
- J v DLA
- Ahmed v Metroline Travel Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.