Case 8000529/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Roarty v Teriv Flooring Limited st and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000529/2025
- Decision date
- 15 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Walker
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr S Roarty
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out Mr S Roarty’s claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that on 25 June 2025 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant reminding him to reply to orders dated 05 June 2025, which required details of financial loss within 14 days, but no reply was received.
The Tribunal then sent further reminders on 04 July 2025 and 16 July 2025, again with no response. On 25 July 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 08 August 2025, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. No reply was received, and the claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not specify the pleaded claim type in the body of the text; the GOV.UK listing categorises the case as Breach of Contract. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.