Case 8000560/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000560/2023 Mr G Ocytko v Represented by: The Law Society of Scotland — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000560/2023
- Decision date
- 21 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000560/2023 Mr G Ocytko
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 21 February 2024, Employment Judge M A Macleod struck out Mr G Ocytko's claim against the Law Society of Scotland under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment records two grounds: non-compliance with an order of the Tribunal under rule 37(1)(c), and that the claim had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The reasons state that on 13 February 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 4pm on 19 February 2024 or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The judgment contains no findings on the underlying merits of any substantive claim and records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 for non-compliance with an order of the Tribunal and because the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.