Case 8000604/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Grier v Caledonian Logistics Ltd and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000604/2024
- Decision date
- 13 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow via CVP
Parties
4 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing held in Glasgow via CVP on 12 August 2024, Employment Judge R McPherson gave oral reasons and found that Caledonian Logistics Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr S Grier’s wages. The deductions related to unpaid car allowance of £1,336.00 gross and unpaid commission of £18,025.13 gross.
The tribunal awarded those sums to the claimant and stated that the figures were expressed gross of tax and national insurance. The respondent was ordered to pay the net sum due in respect of both amounts, with any lawful deductions for tax and employees’ national insurance to be accounted for by the respondent to HMRC if applicable.
No other claim outcome, liability issue, or separate remedy calculation is recorded in the extracted judgment text, and the written reasons were not provided because the reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of unpaid car allowance (£1,336.00 gross) and unpaid commission (£18,025.13 gross). The award was expressed gross, with the respondent to pay the net sum due and account for any tax and employees’ national insurance required. | Upheld | — | £19,361 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,361
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.