Case 8000612/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000612/2024 M Boyer v Tony Macaroni Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000612/2024
- Decision date
- 22 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000612/2024 M Boyer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The respondent was found to have failed to pay the claimant in lieu of holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered payment of the net sum of £666.88, calculated by reference to 64 hours at £10.42 per hour.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. It ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,084.52 in respect of wages for the periods ending 24 February 2024, 2 March 2024 and 9 March 2024.
The judgment allowed the respondent to deduct income tax and employee National Insurance contributions, if required by law, before payment, provided the deductions were remitted to HMRC and written evidence was supplied to the claimant. The hearing listed for 12 August 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the net sum of £666.88, calculated as 64 hours at £10.42 per hour. | Upheld | — | £667 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of the pay periods ending 24 February 2024, 2 March 2024 and 9 March 2024, and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,084.52. | Upheld | — | £1,085 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,751
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.