Case 8000634/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000634/2023 Preliminary Hearing by Cloud Video Platform at Edinburgh on January 2024 Employment Judge: M A Macleod v Christopher Hunt International Professional Resources Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000634/2023
- Decision date
- 21 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hendry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000634/2023 Preliminary Hearing by Cloud Video Platform at Edinburgh on January 2024 Employment Judge: M A Macleod
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim dated 3 December 2023 complaining of disability discrimination against International Professional Resources Limited. The respondent applied for the claim to be dismissed at a preliminary hearing on the basis that the tribunal had already determined, in earlier proceedings between the same parties, that it had no territorial jurisdiction over claims relating to the claimant's employment with the respondent.
The tribunal recorded that the earlier case, 8000150/2022, had included unfair dismissal, unlawful deductions from wages and race discrimination claims and had been dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with the claims also struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. It noted that the claimant had not successfully appealed that judgment. Although the claimant said this new claim was about disability discrimination and that the discriminatory acts took place in the UK, he also accepted that there had been no disability discrimination complaint in the first case and that he had not applied to amend it.
Employment Judge Macleod held that there had been a prior determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, that the determination had been made in litigation between the same parties, and that the subject matter and the points in controversy were the same because the tribunal would again have to decide whether it had jurisdiction by reference to territorial scope. The judge concluded that the issue had already been adjudicated in Employment Judge Hosie's earlier judgment and that the present claim was therefore barred by res judicata.
The judgment dismissed the claimant's claim on that basis. No monetary award was made and no remedy was assessed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claim was dismissed at a preliminary hearing on the basis of res judicata. The tribunal held that the claimant's earlier proceedings against the same respondent had already determined the jurisdictional issue relating to his employment, so the disability discrimination claim could not continue. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- res judicata
- Richard Durkin v HSBC Bank Plc [2016] CSIH 93
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.