Case 8000663/2023 · Employment Tribunal
C Thomson v Cambuslang Grill Ltd (Dissolved) — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000663/2023
- Decision date
- 29 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Thomson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The respondent company had been dissolved, and the claimant had not applied to have the company restored to the Register of Companies.
On 18 October 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 25 October 2024 explaining why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The judgment records the strike out decision on 28 October 2024, with entry in the register and copying to the parties on 29 October 2024. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive pleaded causes of action. It states only that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.