Case 8000670/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Campbell v BRVS Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000670/2023
- Decision date
- 29 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sutherland
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Campbell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment made on the available material because the respondent presented no response. The claimant, Ms G Campbell, worked from 9 October to 1 December 2023. The tribunal recorded that she was due monthly pay of £2,583.33 on an annual salary of £31,000, and that she was paid £1,547 on 31 October and £1,609 on 30 November, leaving shortfalls of £1,036.33 and £974.33 respectively. It also found £49.67 due for overtime. On that basis, the tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £2,060.33 gross. The tribunal noted that, because the respondent had previously failed to remit Income Tax and Employee National Insurance Contributions to HMRC, the claimant would instead be responsible for doing so.
The tribunal also found that, under contract and statute, the claimant was entitled to one week's notice and ordered the respondent to pay £596.15 gross, calculated by reference to the annual salary of £31,000. In addition, it found that the claimant had not been provided with itemised pay statements and granted a declaration to that effect.
The complaints under sections 47B and 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The judgment therefore resulted in monetary awards of £2,060.33 and £596.15, with the remaining pay-statement complaint resolved by declaration only.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a shortfall in wages for October and November 2023, including unpaid overtime, and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,060.33. | Upheld | — | £2,060 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant was entitled to one week's notice under contract and statute, and the tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £596.15. | Upheld | — | £596 |
| Whistleblowing | The complaints under sections 47B and 103A ERA 1996 were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found that the claimant had not been provided with itemised pay statements and granted a declaration to that effect. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,656
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.