Case 8000687/2024 · Employment Tribunal
N Lang v CHANGINGDAY Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000687/2024
- Decision date
- 10 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N Lang
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out N Lang's claim against Changingday Ltd (In Liquidation) under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and that the claimant had been notified of the need to obtain court consent to institute or continue the proceedings under the Insolvency Act 1986, but no such consent had been obtained.
On 24 March 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. The time limit for doing so passed and the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. No merits findings or remedy award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify the substantive working-time issue, but the gov.uk listing category for the case is Working Time Regulations. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.