Case 8000692/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000692/2024 Mr J Bradley v Simply Solutions Group Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000692/2024
- Decision date
- 21 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000692/2024 Mr J Bradley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment under rule 21 on the available material. The tribunal found that Simply Solutions Group Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr J Bradley’s wages for the months of April and May 2024, and ordered payment of £9,366.68 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,333.34, being one month’s pay. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,392.89 gross, calculated as 11.7 days at £119.05 per day. The judgment stated that the respondent could deduct income tax and employee National Insurance from the sums awarded at paragraphs 1 and 3, if required by law, before remitting the balance to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for April and May 2024. | Upheld | — | £9,367 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded at one month’s pay. | Upheld | — | £3,333 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement of 11.7 days at £119.05 per day. | Upheld | — | £1,393 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,093
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.