Case 8000739/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000739/2024 Ms A Tait v Simply Solutions Group Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000739/2024
- Decision date
- 19 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000739/2024 Ms A Tait
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been presented, so the Employment Judge determined the claim on the available material. The tribunal found that the claimant, Ms A Tait, had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded her damages of £2,083.33, described as one month’s pay.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant in lieu of holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £532.80 net, calculated on the basis of 6 days at £88.80 per day.
In addition, the tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages in respect of wages for the period ending 8 May 2024. It ordered payment of £2,604.08 gross. The judgment also directed that tax and employee National Insurance could be deducted from the gross sums where required by law, with payment of the balance satisfying the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages for breach of contract in respect of notice; ordered as a gross sum of £2,083.33, described as 1 month's pay. | Upheld | — | £2,083 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay in lieu of holiday entitlement; ordered as a net sum of £532.80, calculated as 6 days at £88.80 per day. | Upheld | — | £533 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for the period ending 8 May 2024; ordered as a gross sum of £2,604.08. | Upheld | — | £2,604 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,220
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.