Case 8000798/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Mulholland v Resolve Phb Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8000798/2026
- Decision date
- 30 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Mulholland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing on 28 July 2026, Employment Judge A Jones found that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine Mr S Mulholland’s claims against Resolve PHB Ltd because they were lodged outside the statutory period. For the redundancy payment claim, the Tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to exercise discretion.
For the other claims, which the judgment does not identify by type, the Tribunal found that it had been reasonably practicable for Mr Mulholland to lodge them within the statutory period. Mr Mulholland appeared in person; the respondent did not appear. Oral reasons were given, and the written judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The Tribunal found that the claim was lodged outside the statutory period and that it had no jurisdiction to exercise discretion. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers collectively to other claims without identifying their types; they are therefore grouped here. The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction because they were lodged outside the statutory period and it was reasonably practicable to lodge them in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Statutory time limits
- Whether it was reasonably practicable to lodge the claims within the statutory period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.