Case 8000829/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8000829/2025 Ms L Sharpe v Rio Sol Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000829/2025
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8000829/2025 Ms L Sharpe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge D Hoey struck out Ms L Sharpe's claim against Rio Sol Ltd under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the claim was struck out on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 38(1)(d).
The reasons state that the Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 12 May 2025 seeking further information, received no reply, and sent a further letter on 20 May 2025, again with no response. A strike-out warning letter was then issued on 30 May 2025 giving the claimant until 13 June 2025 to respond or explain why judgment should not be issued, but the claimant did not respond, give reasons, or request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment does not restate the underlying cause of action, but the gov.uk listing for this case identifies the claim as unlawful deduction from wages. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38(1)(d)
- rule 38 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.