Case 8000842/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Black v (remote) Ziyx Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8000842/2026
- Decision date
- 13 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Black
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningZiyx Ltd's defence was withdrawn. At the final hearing in Glasgow on 10 August 2026, the tribunal found Mr J Black entitled to £11,133 net under a head described in the judgment as 'unpaid pages'. That wording leaves the nature of this award unclear.
The tribunal also awarded £2,475 net for unpaid holiday pay and £3,576 net for notice pay. The three awards add up to £17,184 net, although the judgment does not state an aggregate total. Judgment was issued orally with summary reasons; the written judgment records the entitlements without setting out the underlying factual findings or legal tests.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment describes this award as 'unpaid pages'. That wording is unclear, so the claim type is recorded as other. The award is net. | Upheld | — | £11,133 |
| Holiday pay | Award for unpaid holiday pay, stated net. | Upheld | — | £2,475 |
| Other | Award for notice pay, stated net. The judgment does not identify the legal basis, so the claim is recorded as other. | Upheld | — | £3,576 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,184
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.