Case 8000864/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Crawford v Cater Property Investment (Dundee) Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 8000864/2025
- Decision date
- 29 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Crawford
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr J Crawford was unfairly dismissed by Cater Property Investment (Dundee) Limited under section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for asserting a statutory right. The claim was undefended because the Response Form had been struck out. Employment Judge A Kemp was satisfied from the Schedule of Loss and supporting documents that judgment under Rule 22 was appropriate. The compensatory award was £38,366.64, based on net pay of £737.82 per week for one year after dismissal. Mr Crawford said that he had not found work or received state benefits during that period, so the recoupment provisions did not apply.
The tribunal also held that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from Mr Crawford's wages in respect of accrued holiday pay. Although the Schedule of Loss sought payment for 37 days, the tribunal awarded 28 days because the Working Time Regulations 1998 provided a minimum annual entitlement of 28 days and no provision for carrying forward unused leave. At £195 per day, based on gross weekly pay of £975, the holiday pay award was £5,460. The two awards total £43,826.64. The respondent may make appropriate deductions if it pays them to HMRC and gives Mr Crawford written evidence of payment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The award is stated numerically as £38,366.64 and is confirmed by the calculation of £737.82 per week for one year. The amount written in words in paragraph 1 differs by £30. | Upheld | — | £38,367 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as an unauthorised deduction from wages relating to accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £5,460 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £43,827
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £38,367
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998
- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.