Case 8000869/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000869/2024 Mr W Haddow v MF Heating and Plumbing Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000869/2024
- Decision date
- 30 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000869/2024 Mr W Haddow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. The Employment Judge therefore issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £4,117.67 gross. It also upheld the breach of contract claim, finding that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and awarded damages of £3,405.70 gross.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,108.59. The hearing listed for 22 November 2024 was cancelled. The combined monetary awards total £12,631.96.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent presented no response. The Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material and ordered payment of £4,117.67 gross for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £4,118 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £3,405.70 gross. | Upheld | — | £3,406 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,108.59. | Upheld | — | £5,109 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,632
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.