Case 8000917/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000917/2024 Mr J White v MW Groundworks Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000917/2024
- Decision date
- 16 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000917/2024 Mr J White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr J White's claim against MW Groundworks Ltd under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The reasons recorded that the claimant was asked on 24 July 2024 to provide further information by 7 August 2024, but no further information was provided.
A reminder was sent on 13 August 2024. On 29 August 2024 the tribunal issued a strike out warning and gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 12 September 2024, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to pursue the claim actively. The judgment does not record any merits findings on the underlying substantive claims, and it does not record any award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action in the extracted text; it records that the claim as a whole was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.