Case 8000964/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Meek v CDE Windows and Doors Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000964/2024
- Decision date
- 15 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCluskey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Meek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Meek was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that his statutory redundancy payment claim was well-founded. It awarded £4,127.25, calculated by reference to his age of 55, five years' continuous service, and gross weekly pay of £550.30.
The unfair dismissal complaint was also well-founded. The tribunal held that no basic award was payable because the statutory redundancy payment was equivalent to a basic award and double counting would arise. It found no compensatory award for loss of earnings because Mr Meek's employment ended on 12 April 2024, his new employment began on 15 April 2024, his new gross monthly pay of £2,833.33 was higher than his former pay of £2,384.62, and there was no period without income.
Although no earnings loss was proved, the tribunal awarded £500 for loss of statutory employment protection rights because Mr Meek had five years' continuous service. It also upheld the holiday pay complaint, finding that the respondent had failed to pay for holidays accrued but untaken at the end of employment, and awarded £117.
Finally, the tribunal declared that the respondent had failed to provide written itemised pay statements for March and April 2024, contrary to section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No financial award was made on that point because the claimant was aware of the sums due.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded on the basis of age 55, five years' continuous service, and gross weekly pay of £550.30. | Upheld | — | £4,127 |
| Holiday pay | Unauthorised deduction claim succeeded for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended; claimant was held responsible for any tax or National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £117 |
| Unfair dismissal | No basic award was made because the statutory redundancy payment was treated as equivalent to the basic award and double counting was avoided; no compensatory award was made for earnings loss because the claimant started new employment on 15 April 2024 at higher pay and had no loss of income. £500 was awarded for loss of statutory employment protection rights. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Other | Declaration made that the respondent failed to give written itemised pay statements for March and April 2024 under section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996; no financial award was made. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,744
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.