Case 8000967/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000967/2024 Mr E Passley v Ccpn Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000967/2024
- Decision date
- 1 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000967/2024 Mr E Passley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been presented by Ccpn Limited. On the available material, Employment Judge Hendry found that the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages from Mr E Passley.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £2,219.70. The judgment records that this amount was calculated on the basis of 80 hours at £15 per hour and 45.32 hours at £22.50 per hour. The judgment also provides that the respondent may deduct any income tax and employee National Insurance contributions required by law before payment, provided the deductions are remitted to HMRC and written evidence is given to the claimant.
The hearing listed for 1 November 2024 at 14.30 was cancelled following the issue of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented by the respondent. The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,219.70, calculated on the basis of 80 hours at £15 per hour and 45.32 hours at £22.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £2,220 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,220
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.