Case 8000977/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8000977/2026 R Anderson v Energy Systems Scotland Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8000977/2026
- Decision date
- 3 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCluskey Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8000977/2026 R Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to R Anderson's claim against Energy Systems Scotland Limited. Employment Judge McCluskey issued judgment on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £3,033.36 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,142.40 in damages. The claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,876.00. The three stated awards total £8,051.76.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award is a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £3,033 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £2,142 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,876 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,052
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.