Case 8001018/2025 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001018/2025 Held by Video Conference in Aberdeen on September 2025 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr P Jurgiel v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001018/2025
- Decision date
- 23 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001018/2025 Held by Video Conference in Aberdeen on September 2025 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr P Jurgiel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant complained of automatic unfair dismissal, alleging that he was dismissed for asserting a statutory right by asking to receive training relevant to new responsibilities and that he was denied an appeal against his disciplinary dismissal. The respondent admitted dismissal but said the reason was conduct, namely gross misconduct, and argued that the claim was out of time and had no reasonable prospect of success.
The Tribunal found that the effective date of termination was 15 December 2024, ACAS early conciliation ran from 9 January 2025 to 20 February 2025, and the last day for presenting the claim was 25 April 2025. The claim was presented on 27 April 2025. The Tribunal was not persuaded that the claimant's explanations, including being in Poland and preparing documents, made timely presentation not reasonably practicable, particularly given his awareness of the time limit and previous experience of Employment Tribunal proceedings.
The Tribunal also considered the pleaded case at its highest and found that it had no reasonable prospect of success. It was not persuaded that requesting training or alleging failure to afford an appeal were assertions of a relevant statutory right under section 104(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and it accepted the respondent's submission that the pleaded matters did not meet the requirements of the potentially relevant health and safety provisions. The claim was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction and struck out under Rule 38(1)(a).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant brought an automatic unfair dismissal complaint based on alleged assertion of a statutory right. The judgment also dismissed the claim as time-barred for want of jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.207B Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser
- Lowri Beck Services Ltd v Brophy
- Rule 38(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Procedural Rules 2024
- s.104(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.100 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Kumari v Greater Manchester NHS Trust Foundation
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.