Case 8001047/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Ritchie v Represented by: Ms K Law, lay representative Whitbread Group plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 8001047/2024
- Decision date
- 15 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Campbell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Ritchie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs M Ritchie brought a disability discrimination complaint alleging failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010. She relied on Spina Bifida and Scoliosis and said she required a wheelchair in daily life. The respondent accepted that she met the definition of disabled under section 6 of the Act.
The hearing was a preliminary hearing on time bar only. The tribunal found that the claim was not presented within the primary three-month limit, calculating that if the alleged failure to make adjustments continued until the claimant's last day of employment on 1 January 2024, she would have had to begin ACAS early conciliation by 29 March 2024. In fact, she began early conciliation on 15 July 2024 and presented her ET1 on 19 July 2024.
Applying section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010, and the factors identified in British Coal Corporation v Keeble and DPP v Marshall, the tribunal held that it was just and equitable to extend time. It took account of the claimant's lack of legal representation before presenting the claim, her late receipt of advice from the Citizens Advice Bureau, her focus on the internal grievance process and appeal, the promptness with which she contacted ACAS and presented the claim once she sought advice, the absence of identified prejudice to the respondent, and the claim's apparent potential merit.
The claim was therefore allowed to proceed to a full hearing. No substantive finding was made on whether the respondent had failed to make reasonable adjustments, and no remedy was assessed at this stage.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal extended time under section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010 and did not determine the merits of the reasonable adjustments complaint. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble [1997] IRLR 336
- DPP v Marshall [1998] IRLR 494
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.