Case 8001055/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v PriceWaterhouseCooper Services Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001055/2024
- Decision date
- 11 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 11 and 17 June 2025, the tribunal considered whether Mr F George was a disabled person within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 in relation to Burnout and Other Specified Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorder. The respondent had already conceded disability in relation to ASD and ADHD, so those conditions were not in issue. The tribunal heard from the claimant, Dr Sian Armstrong, and Dr Christopher Gordon Salt, and had before it GP and occupational health records together with Dr Armstrong's report.
The tribunal held that Burnout was not itself a condition or impairment, but rather a consequence or symptom of other experiences. It therefore could not amount to a disability within section 6. On the asserted Trauma Disorder, the tribunal did not accept the claimant's case that it existed from August 2020. Greater weight was placed on the contemporaneous GP and occupational health records, and the judge treated Dr Armstrong's opinion with reserve because it depended heavily on the claimant's self-report and did not have the occupational health records.
The tribunal found that the claimant's mental health difficulties were not made out on the evidence before February 2022, but that by 23 February 2022 he had low mood, disrupted sleep and reduced energy, and had started medication. It held that from that date the condition described as Other Specified Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorder amounted to a mental impairment with a substantial, long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. The tribunal made no finding that the condition was caused by the respondent's actions, and the proceedings were sisted after the preliminary issue was decided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal held that Burnout was not a condition or impairment in itself and could not amount to a disability within section 6 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal held that the claimant was disabled by way of Other Specified Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorder from 23 February 2022 onwards under section 6 Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- substantial means more than minor or trivial
- balance of probabilities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.