Case 8001077/2025 · Employment Tribunal
K McCormick v Johnson Corporation — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001077/2025
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
K McCormick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under rule 22 on the available material because no response had been presented. Employment Judge P O'Donnell found that Johnson Corporation had made an unauthorised deduction from K McCormick's wages. The tribunal ordered payment of £4,406.11, calculated as 23 days' gross pay at £191.57 per day for the period 3 February 2025 to 5 March 2025.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £383.14, calculated as 2 days' pay at £191.57 per day in respect of annual leave accrued but not taken by the claimant. The total monetary award reflected the sum of the two orders, £4,789.25.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £4,406.11, described as 23 days' gross pay at £191.57 per day for the period 3 February 2025 to 5 March 2025. | Upheld | — | £4,406 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £383.14, described as 2 days' pay at £191.57 per day for annual leave accrued but not taken. | Upheld | — | £383 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,789
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.