Case 8001082/2025 · Employment Tribunal
A Zaloga v Excellerate Services UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001082/2025
- Decision date
- 24 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Zaloga
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a breach of contract claim arising from the termination of his employment by Excellerate Services UK Limited. The agreed facts were that he transferred under TUPE, his employment including service with the previous employer began on 2 December 2024, he was dismissed on 10 March 2025, and the respondent did not follow its disciplinary policy and procedure. The tribunal recorded that the disciplinary policy was expressly non-contractual.
The claimant argued that the implied terms of mutual trust and confidence and a duty to act reasonably were breached by the respondent's failure to follow a disciplinary process. The tribunal referred to Johnson v Unisys Ltd [2001] ICR 480, HL, and explained that implied terms cannot contradict express terms and cannot make a non-contractual disciplinary policy contractual. It also held that the implied duty of trust and confidence could not be used to qualify an employer's express contractual right to terminate, and that contract law could not be used to create a remedy for the reason and manner of dismissal where Parliament had provided the statutory unfair dismissal regime.
The tribunal noted that the claimant was in effect seeking an unfair dismissal remedy through a contract claim, but he did not have the qualifying service needed to bring an unfair dismissal claim. After giving the claimant time to consider the position, the tribunal rejected the authorities he relied on, including Stevens v University of Birmingham, as not assisting him. It concluded that Johnson remained binding and that the claim of breach of contract had no basis in law, so the claim was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim related to dismissal without following the respondent's disciplinary policy and procedure; the tribunal held the claim had no basis in law. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Johnson v Unisys Ltd [2001] ICR 480, HL
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.