Case 8001084/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Livingstone v Old Vale Bar — 2024
- Case reference
- 8001084/2024
- Decision date
- 4 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Livingstone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland, sitting as Employment Judge M Robison, struck out Mrs C Livingstone's claim against Old Vale Bar under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type(s) in the extracted text.
The tribunal recorded a sequence of unanswered correspondence. On 20 August 2024 it asked the claimant to provide an alternative address for the respondent because the service papers had been returned marked "not at this address". No reply was received, and the tribunal issued reminders on 29 August 2024 and 9 September 2024.
On 17 September 2024 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 1 October 2024, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. No reply was received. The judgment was issued on 2 October 2024 and entered in the register on 4 October 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted text does not state the underlying claim type(s); the judgment only records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.