Case 8001098/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Ellinas v Noble Orr Limited t/a The Cutting Room — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001098/2024
- Decision date
- 19 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Ellinas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Sangster heard the case in Glasgow. The claimant, Ms M Ellinas, pursued a complaint under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, a wrongful dismissal claim, and an unfair dismissal claim against Noble Orr Limited t/a The Cutting Room. The section 23 complaint did not succeed and was dismissed.
The tribunal upheld the wrongful dismissal claim and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £914.91 net as damages for breach of contract. It also upheld the unfair dismissal claim and awarded £2,250.64 in compensation.
The unfair dismissal award was broken down into a basic award of £2,000.64 and a compensatory award of £250. Oral reasons were given at the hearing under Rule 60 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, and written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment identifies this only as a complaint under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The claim succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £914.91 as damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £915 |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay £2,250.64 compensation, made up of a basic award of £2,000.64 and a compensatory award of £250. | Upheld | — | £2,251 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,166
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,001
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £250
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.