Case 8001111/2024 · Employment Tribunal
K Ruiza v Nuclear Restoration Services Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001111/2024
- Decision date
- 24 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Mackay
Parties
2 namedClaimant
K Ruiza
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge R Mackay in Glasgow. The claimant, K Ruiza, appeared in person and the respondent, Nuclear Restoration Services Ltd, was represented by Mr Bryden, solicitor.
The only substantive decision recorded was that the claimant's application to amend his claim was refused. The judgment states that the case will proceed to a final hearing on the dates previously assigned. Oral reasons were given at the conclusion of the hearing, but the written extract does not set out the reasons in detail.
No substantive discrimination or dismissal claim was determined in this judgment, and no remedy was awarded. The decision is procedural only and leaves the underlying claim to be decided at the final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a preliminary hearing decision only. It refused the claimant's application to amend his claim and did not adjudicate any substantive tribunal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.