Case 8001113/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001113/2024 Mr T Coyne v Cygnet Resources Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 8001113/2024
- Decision date
- 26 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001113/2024 Mr T Coyne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that Mr T Coyne was awarded £3,240 as pay in lieu of notice, calculated at 6 weeks x £540.
The tribunal also awarded £4,680 as a redundancy payment, calculated at 9 weeks x £540. The judgment does not set out further findings of dispute between the parties; it simply determines the monetary sums payable on the material before the tribunal.
The hearing listed for 25 October 2024 was cancelled. The judgment also permits the respondent to deduct Income Tax and Employee National Insurance Contributions, if required by law, before paying the balance to the claimant, provided the deductions are properly remitted to HMRC and evidenced to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded as pay in lieu of notice, calculated as 6 weeks x £540. | Upheld | — | £3,240 |
| Redundancy | Awarded as a redundancy payment, calculated as 9 weeks x £540. | Upheld | — | £4,680 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,920
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.