Case 8001174/2025 · Employment Tribunal
D Ross v Pitlessie Pantry Ltd (Compulsory — 2026
- Case reference
- 8001174/2025
- Decision date
- 12 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
D Ross
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out D Ross's claim against Pitlessie Pantry Ltd (Compulsory Liquidation) under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not determine the merits of the claim or record any monetary award.
The claimant was told on 18 October 2025 that consent from the court was needed under the Insolvency Act 1986 for the proceedings to be instituted or continued. The Tribunal received no reply to its request of 11 June 2026 for confirmation that permission had been sought, nor to its notice of 20 July 2026 giving the claimant until 3 August 2026 to explain why the claim should not be struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment refers only to "the claim" and does not state its subject matter; the working time classification follows the gov.uk listing category supplied in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.