Case 8001176/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001176/2024 Mr P Iglinski v LS Holdings Forfar Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8001176/2024
- Decision date
- 25 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001176/2024 Mr P Iglinski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the material available because no response had been presented. Employment Judge I McFatridge recorded that the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered LS Holdings Forfar Ltd to pay the claimant £1,538.18 gross. The figure was stated to be calculated on the basis of 68.15 hours at £14.50 per hour, together with £550 additional losses due to late payment.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,450 gross. That sum was calculated by reference to 12.5 days at 8 hours per day at £14.50 per hour. The judgment allowed the respondent to deduct income tax and employee National Insurance contributions, if required by law, provided the balance was paid to the claimant and the deductions were remitted to HMRC with written evidence.
The hearing listed for 17 October 2024 at 14.30 was cancelled. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment was £2,988.18.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered payment of £1,538.18 gross, described as 68.15 hours at £14.50 per hour plus £550 additional losses due to late payment. | Upheld | — | £1,538 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,450 gross, calculated on the basis of 12.5 days x 8 hours per day x £14.50. | Upheld | — | £1,450 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,988
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.