Case 8001190/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Y Dunbar v Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) — 2024
- Case reference
- 8001190/2024
- Decision date
- 17 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Y Dunbar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a Personal Secretary in the Office of the Traffic Commissioner. In a restructuring exercise, the respondent treated her as having been matched to Compliance Casework Officer and Hearing Centre Support Officer roles. The Tribunal found that the claimant had remained a Personal Secretary, had not undertaken casework, and that no matching exercise had been carried out against her actual role. Had that been done, the Tribunal found the roles would not have been a match.
The Tribunal found that the respondent did not appropriately address the claimant's concerns about the matching process, did not offer alternatives or place her on the redeployment register, and took no steps after receiving an occupational health report on 5 February 2024 to consider adjustments or discuss whether she could undertake the matched roles. The Tribunal found that the failure to act after that report was not a repudiatory breach by itself, but formed part of a cumulative course of conduct amounting to a repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.
The Tribunal concluded that the claimant resigned in response to that breach and was constructively dismissed. It found the dismissal unfair, rejecting the respondent's case that the dismissal was fairly by reason of redundancy or some other substantial reason, because a fair process had not been followed in relation to matching, consideration of concerns, or redeployment alternatives. The Tribunal awarded a basic award of £11,694.30 and £500 for loss of statutory rights, but made no award for loss of earnings because the claimant had started part-time NHS employment and had not taken further steps to secure full-time or additional work.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was presented and determined as constructive unfair dismissal. The Tribunal found that the claimant was constructively dismissed and that the dismissal was unfair. | Upheld | — | £12,194 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,194
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £11,694
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
12 references- s94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International Ltd
- Lewis v Motorworld Garages Ltd
- Omilaju v Waltham Forest London Borough Council
- Nottinghamshire County Council v Meikle
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust
- s98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- range of reasonable responses
- Morrow v Safeway Stores plc
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.