Case 8001224/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Page v The Drouthy Cobbler — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001224/2025
- Decision date
- 27 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge NM Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Page
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge NM Hosie issued judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the available material. The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages from Mr C Page.
The respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £1,500, calculated on the basis of 5 weeks at 25 hours per week at £12 per hour. The judgment further provided that the respondent could deduct Income Tax and employee National Insurance contributions, if required by law, before payment, provided it remitted any deducted sums to HMRC and gave the claimant written evidence of the deductions and remittance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment under Rule 22 on the available material; no response was presented. The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,500, calculated as 5 weeks x 25 hours per week x £12 per hour. The judgment also allowed deductions for Income Tax and employee NICs if required by law. | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.