Case 8001243/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N D Marshall v Whisky Merchants Trading Ltd (in Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001243/2025
- Decision date
- 30 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N D Marshall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Glasgow via the Cloud Video Platform on 21 October 2025, before Employment Judge F Eccles, the tribunal recorded that the respondent, Whisky Merchants Trading Ltd (In Administration), did not appear and was not represented. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Miss N D Marshall accrued holiday pay of £853.15.
The tribunal dismissed the complaints of unfair dismissal, breach of contract (notice pay), and unauthorised deduction from wages. The extracted judgment does not set out any further reasoning or make any separate award beyond the holiday pay sum.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment awards accrued holiday pay of £853.15; the extracted text does not specify a separate statutory label, so this is classified as holiday_pay. | Upheld | — | £853 |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a notice pay claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this as an unauthorised deduction from wages complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £853
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.