Case 8001266/2026 · Employment Tribunal
C Ross v Viva Italia Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8001266/2026
- Decision date
- 30 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J McCluskey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Ross
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld C Ross's four complaints against Viva Italia LTD in a judgment under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The claim form was sent to the respondent on 3 June 2026, but it did not respond within the 28 days required by rule 17. Employment Judge J McCluskey decided that liability and remedy could be determined on the available material without a hearing.
The tribunal awarded £2,112.67 for unauthorised deductions from wages. This comprised unpaid salary of £727.05 for the week ending 6 May 2026 and £814.52 for the week ending 13 May 2026, unpaid tips/tronc of £205.72, and accrued but unpaid holiday pay of £365.38.
The claimant had received no written statement of employment particulars in the relevant period. Under sections 38 and 39 of the Employment Act 2002, the tribunal found it just and equitable to award four weeks' gross pay. Weekly gross pay of £961.54 was capped at £751, giving an award of £3,004.
The breach of contract complaint concerned notice pay. One month's notice had been discussed verbally with the claimant for the General Manager role. The tribunal awarded £4,166.67, representing one month's gross wages.
The tribunal found that the claimant made a protected disclosure on 25 April 2026 and was dismissed on 14 May 2026 because of that disclosure. The automatic unfair dismissal complaint succeeded. The claimant was unemployed for over a month before obtaining another job at £39,000 a year, compared with £50,000 with the respondent. The tribunal awarded £8,333.34, representing two months' gross salary. The total award across the four complaints was £17,616.68, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Includes unpaid salary of £727.05 and £814.52, unpaid tips/tronc of £205.72, and accrued but unpaid holiday pay of £365.38. Holiday pay was included within this complaint. | Upheld | — | £2,113 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. Four weeks' gross pay awarded under sections 38 and 39 Employment Act 2002, with weekly gross pay of £961.54 capped at £751. | Upheld | — | £3,004 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay of one month's gross wages. One month's notice had been discussed verbally for the claimant's General Manager role. | Upheld | — | £4,167 |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure. The award was two months' gross salary; the judgment does not separately identify basic and compensatory awards. | Upheld | — | £8,333 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,617
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 17 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Sections 38 and 39 Employment Act 2002: just and equitable award of four weeks' gross pay
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.