Case 8001342/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Condon v Inverclyde Community Development Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001342/2025
- Decision date
- 22 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Condon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss C Condon, started work as an employment support worker on 10 October 2023 and was accepted to be disabled by reason of depression. She brought unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims after resigning on 1 February 2025, but the unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn at a preliminary hearing because she did not have two years' service.
The tribunal applied section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, together with the comparison requirement in section 23 and the burden-of-proof approach in section 136. It accepted that the respondent knew of the claimant's disability, but found that none of her absences had been recorded as due to depression and that she did not raise any formal concern during the return-to-work meetings that her mental health was deteriorating. The tribunal made positive findings that the reasons for the treatment complained of were not because of disability.
On the allegation about medical certificates, the tribunal found that the requirement arose after the claimant's absences reached the level where the respondent would intervene on absence management, and that it was based on the level of absence rather than disability. On the hours and workload complaints, the tribunal found that the claimant was not in the same material position as the comparator, Ms Percival, whose hours were reduced for health reasons, and that the January 2025 redistribution of caseloads was a response to an imbalance across the team rather than anything linked to the claimant's depression.
On the remaining complaints, the tribunal found that there was no investigation into the claimant herself, only an investigation into Mr Craig Wilson's absences and the overlap between absences in the small team. It also found that the respondent did not refuse a reference: it issued factual references in line with its policy, including to Barnardos and Marie Curie. The tribunal therefore dismissed the disability discrimination claim as not well-founded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dealt with one direct disability discrimination claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010, covering the fit-note requirement after November 2024, hours of work, workload redistribution, the pattern-of-absences issue, and the reference issue. The separate unfair dismissal claim had already been withdrawn at a preliminary hearing because the claimant did not have two years' service. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.23 Equality Act 2010
- s.136 Equality Act 2010
- Hewage v Grampian Health Board
- Burrett v West Birmingham Health Authority
- Igen v Wong
- Madarassy v Nomura International plc
- Denman v EHRC
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.