Case 8001362/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001362/2024 Mr N Capon v LBD Pubs Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8001362/2024
- Decision date
- 31 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001362/2024 Mr N Capon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented. Employment Judge I McFatridge determined the case without a hearing and cancelled the listed hearing on 15 January 2025.
The tribunal found that LBD Pubs Ltd had unlawfully withheld wages from Mr N Capon. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,312.50, described as gross wages without deduction of tax and calculated on the basis of 87.5 hours at £15 per hour.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £435.00, again described as gross wages without deduction of tax and calculated on the basis of 29 hours at £15 per hour.
The judgment authorised the respondent to make any required deductions for Income Tax and employee National Insurance contributions, provided those deductions were remitted to HMRC and evidenced in writing to the claimant. The total amount awarded was £1,747.50.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered payment of £1,312.50, calculated as 87.5 hours at £15 per hour, gross and before any tax deduction. | Upheld | — | £1,313 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £435.00, calculated as 29 hours at £15 per hour, gross and before any tax deduction. | Upheld | — | £435 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,748
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.