Case 8001392/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001392/2024 Miss A C Barnabas v Ozen (Edinburgh) Ltd (t/a Ozen Street Food) — 2024
- Case reference
- 8001392/2024
- Decision date
- 19 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001392/2024 Miss A C Barnabas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that Ozen (Edinburgh) Ltd (t/a Ozen Street Food) had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss A C Barnabas's wages and ordered payment of £764.16 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £517.03 gross, stated to be 1.4 weeks at £369.31 gross weekly pay. The hearing listed for 19 November 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £764.16. | Upheld | — | £764 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £517.03, calculated as 1.4 weeks at £369.31 gross weekly pay. | Upheld | — | £517 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,281
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.