Case 8001403/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Laird v Mr Craig McIsaac — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001403/2024
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Laird
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge A Jones issued a Rule 22 judgment on the available material after a final hearing on Cloud Video Platform on 4 June 2025. Miss A Laird appeared in person and Mr Craig McIsaac did not appear.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The judgment records unpaid holiday pay of £2,880 for 2022, 2023 and 2024, unpaid wages of £2,400 for 11 March 2024 to 16 April 2024, and deductions of £5,229.51 in respect of sums deducted from wages and not remitted to HMRC.
The order states that the claimant is to be paid £10,709.51 gross. The extracted text lists the component figures above; those figures do not arithmetically match the total order in the text, so the award is recorded as stated by the tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 judgment on the available material. The extracted text lists component sums of £2,880, £2,400 and £5,229.51, while the dispositive order states £10,709.51 gross. | Upheld | — | £10,710 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,710
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.