Case 8001431/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P H McAuley v The Law Society of Scotland — 2026
- Case reference
- 8001431/2025
- Decision date
- 29 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P H McAuley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge M Whitcombe held that Mr P H McAuley's entire claim against the Law Society of Scotland was dismissed with effect from 4pm on 9 February 2026. The claimant had materially failed to comply with the unless order issued on 3 February 2026 under rule 39(1) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The sanction attached to that order therefore took effect, and the judgment constituted written notice of the dismissal.
The tribunal held that, alternatively, the entire claim would have been struck out under rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. Reliance on Irish ethnicity and the argument based on section 21 of the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 would each also have been struck out under rule 38(1)(b). The tribunal found it an abuse of process and unreasonable to re-litigate at Employment Tribunal level issues already decided between the parties in case 8001535/2024.
The claimant requested written reasons before the decision was made. Summary oral reasons were given, and the judgment stated that written reasons would follow as soon as practicable. The respondent reserved its position on an application for expenses, to which the normal requirements of rule 75 would apply. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Race classification is based on the express reference to Irish ethnicity. The judgment does not identify any other distinct discrimination claims. The operative outcome was dismissal under rule 39(1); the strike-out rulings were alternative grounds. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, rule 39(1): dismissal following material non-compliance with an unless order
- Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, rule 38(1)(a): no reasonable prospect of success
- Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, rule 38(1)(b): abuse of process and unreasonable re-litigation
- Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, rule 75: requirements for an expenses application
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.