Case 8001452/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Cook v Secretary of State for Business & Trade — 2024
- Case reference
- 8001452/2024
- Decision date
- 18 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Cook
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was a director and 50% shareholder of J&L Leisure Limited, which operated a restaurant and entered creditors voluntary liquidation on 13 February 2024. He applied to the respondent for a statutory redundancy payment, unpaid wages and holiday pay, but the respondent refused his application by letter dated 24 May 2024. The claimant presented his tribunal claim on 15 September 2024.
The Tribunal found that the section 188 ERA complaints about unpaid wages and holiday pay were out of time. It held that the three-month time limit ran from the 24 May 2024 decision letter and expired at the latest on 23 August 2024. The claimant had been told he could bring a tribunal claim, had been directed to guidance explaining the relevant time limit, and had access to advice from an insolvency practitioner. The Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for him to lodge the claim within the primary time limit and therefore had no jurisdiction to consider those complaints.
On employment status, the Tribunal found that the March 2020 Statement of Main Terms of Employment did not reflect the reality of the relationship at the date of insolvency. The claimant was not supervised or managed, determined his own and others' hours, was paid by reference to what he considered the company could afford rather than by hours worked or the national minimum wage, and did not take holidays in the way employees did. The Tribunal concluded he was not an employee under section 230(1) ERA at the relevant date, so he had no entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment and the section 166 complaint was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint under section 188 ERA concerning unpaid wages said to be due under section 182 ERA was dismissed because it was presented outside the three-month time limit and the Tribunal found it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Complaint under section 188 ERA concerning unpaid holiday pay said to be due under section 182 ERA was dismissed because it was presented outside the three-month time limit and the Tribunal found it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Complaint under section 166 ERA for a statutory redundancy payment was dismissed because the Tribunal found the claimant was not an employee at the relevant date and therefore had no entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
12 references- s188(2) ERA
- reasonably practicable
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust v Williams
- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd
- Wall's Meat Co Ltd v Khan
- s230(1) ERA
- s230(2) ERA
- Ready Mixed Concrete test
- Hall v Lorimer
- Lee v Lee's Air Farming Limited
- Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform v Neufeld
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.