Case 8001487/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001487/2024 Mr J Grech v ARRIA Data Text Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 8001487/2024
- Decision date
- 11 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001487/2024 Mr J Grech
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so Employment Judge J Hendry issued a rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that ARRIA Data2Text Limited had unlawfully withheld wages from Mr J Grech and ordered the respondent to pay him the gross sum of £8,916.00.
The judgment explains the calculation of that sum: £2,500 per month for March 2024, April 2024 and May 2024, plus £1,416 for 17 days worked in June 2024. It also cancelled the hearing listed for 3 December 2024.
The respondent was permitted to make any required deductions for income tax and employee National Insurance Contributions, provided those sums were remitted to HMRC and written evidence was given to the claimant. The balance, after any lawful deductions, would satisfy the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented. The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £8,916.00, calculated by reference to £2,500 per month for March, April and May 2024 and £1,416 for 17 days worked in June 2024. | Upheld | — | £8,916 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,916
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.