Case 8001511/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Dempster v Tanglewood Hospitality Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001511/2025
- Decision date
- 6 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Campbell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Dempster
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge B Campbell issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The claimant, Mr C Dempster, was awarded a gross sum of £8,975.00 in respect of complaints relating to unpaid wages, holiday pay, bonus, tips and failure to provide written particulars of employment. The judgment orders payment net of any lawful and appropriate deductions, and it does not break the award down between the individual heads of complaint.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awarded a single gross sum in respect of unpaid wages, bonus and tips, but did not split the award by head of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Included in the single gross award; the judgment did not allocate a separate amount to holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide written particulars of employment; the judgment did not allocate a separate amount to this head of complaint. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,975
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.