Case 8001517/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Holloway v Indigo Smart Technologies Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001517/2025
- Decision date
- 15 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Holloway
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss R Holloway brought two claims against Indigo Smart Technologies Limited. The tribunal dismissed her claim for a compensation payment in respect of accrued but untaken annual leave, so the holiday pay claim did not succeed.
The tribunal upheld her claim for an unauthorised deduction from wages relating to a commission payment that was properly payable in March 2025. It declared that the respondent had made the deduction and ordered Indigo Smart Technologies Limited to pay the claimant £50 gross. Written reasons were not issued because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons appears in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant's claim for a compensation payment in respect of accrued but untaken annual leave was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of a commission payment properly payable to the claimant in March 2025 and ordered payment of £50 gross. | Upheld | — | £50 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £50
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.