Case 8001529/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Sinclair v Represented by: Mr B McKinlay - Solicitor Mr D Docherty and 2 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001529/2025
- Decision date
- 16 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
4 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs H Sinclair presented a claim on 16 June 2025 alleging that she had been unfairly, and constructively, dismissed. The respondents did not enter a response. An Employment Judge had previously directed that the case be listed for a hearing because there was an issue about the correct identity of the employer, given that the claimant worked for a Golf Club and the named respondents were said to be part of the club's management committee.
The tribunal did not determine the claim on its merits. The claimant and her representative did not attend the hearing on 10 October 2025, and the judgment records that there was no explanation for their failure to appear. In those circumstances, the Employment Judge decided to dismiss the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the claim after the claimant and her representative did not appear for the hearing. The judgment records that there was no explanation for their absence and does not contain a merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.